<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: B2B web marketing: the platform battle</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.velocitypartners.co.uk/2010/02/08/b2b-web-marketing-the-platform-battle/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.velocitypartners.co.uk/2010/02/08/b2b-web-marketing-the-platform-battle/</link>
	<description>B2B Marketing, Content Marketing and Technology Marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 18:16:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Kessler</title>
		<link>http://www.velocitypartners.co.uk/2010/02/08/b2b-web-marketing-the-platform-battle/comment-page-1/#comment-1086</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Kessler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 10:51:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.velocitypartners.co.uk/?p=1335#comment-1086</guid>
		<description>Good comment and post, Menno.  As I commented there: knitting together point solutions is fine for the confident, tech-savvy marketer.  But the gains in flexibility and reduced lock-in are more than compensated for by an integrated solution -- as long as it&#039;s well-integrated and comes close to the best-of-breed point solutions.

Integration lets one module inform another and makes automation easier.  I don&#039;t want to send email in tool A; build the landing pages in tool B; set up analytics in tool C; set up A/B tests in tool D then repeat when I learn things from the results.  Life&#039;s too short (and I&#039;ll miss opportunities).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good comment and post, Menno.  As I commented there: knitting together point solutions is fine for the confident, tech-savvy marketer.  But the gains in flexibility and reduced lock-in are more than compensated for by an integrated solution &#8212; as long as it&#8217;s well-integrated and comes close to the best-of-breed point solutions.</p>
<p>Integration lets one module inform another and makes automation easier.  I don&#8217;t want to send email in tool A; build the landing pages in tool B; set up analytics in tool C; set up A/B tests in tool D then repeat when I learn things from the results.  Life&#8217;s too short (and I&#8217;ll miss opportunities).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Menno</title>
		<link>http://www.velocitypartners.co.uk/2010/02/08/b2b-web-marketing-the-platform-battle/comment-page-1/#comment-1085</link>
		<dc:creator>Menno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 18:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.velocitypartners.co.uk/?p=1335#comment-1085</guid>
		<description>This is an interesting battle, analogue to the ones that have been fought for years in the world of ERP and CRM. I just devoted a blog to it:  http://lijkendijk.wordpress.com/2010/02/09/11/

Bottom line: None will win, many customers will lose if they put too much trust into single platform tool vendors. It looks nice on paper though...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an interesting battle, analogue to the ones that have been fought for years in the world of ERP and CRM. I just devoted a blog to it:  <a href="http://lijkendijk.wordpress.com/2010/02/09/11/" rel="nofollow">http://lijkendijk.wordpress.com/2010/02/09/11/</a></p>
<p>Bottom line: None will win, many customers will lose if they put too much trust into single platform tool vendors. It looks nice on paper though&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Kessler</title>
		<link>http://www.velocitypartners.co.uk/2010/02/08/b2b-web-marketing-the-platform-battle/comment-page-1/#comment-1084</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Kessler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 14:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.velocitypartners.co.uk/?p=1335#comment-1084</guid>
		<description>Thanks B2Bento -- that was worth more than 2 cents!

We&#039;ve seen this in other tech markets -- lots of &#039;best of breed&#039; innovationsthat ultimately coalesce into integrated suites.  

While I can see all three players existing for a long time, it does feel to me that marketers will want a single interface to learn, a single view of all their online activities and everything integrated to speed automation and share the insight.

So CMS as the mother dashboard, CRM to hold the profiles &amp; behaviours -- and automation tools getting snapped up by one or the other (though, who knows -- they may do the consolidating).

Thanks again for contributing to the conversation..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks B2Bento &#8212; that was worth more than 2 cents!</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve seen this in other tech markets &#8212; lots of &#8216;best of breed&#8217; innovationsthat ultimately coalesce into integrated suites.  </p>
<p>While I can see all three players existing for a long time, it does feel to me that marketers will want a single interface to learn, a single view of all their online activities and everything integrated to speed automation and share the insight.</p>
<p>So CMS as the mother dashboard, CRM to hold the profiles &#038; behaviours &#8212; and automation tools getting snapped up by one or the other (though, who knows &#8212; they may do the consolidating).</p>
<p>Thanks again for contributing to the conversation..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B2Bento</title>
		<link>http://www.velocitypartners.co.uk/2010/02/08/b2b-web-marketing-the-platform-battle/comment-page-1/#comment-1083</link>
		<dc:creator>B2Bento</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 00:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.velocitypartners.co.uk/?p=1335#comment-1083</guid>
		<description>Great topic! Here goes my 2 cents.

Effectiveness of a tool depends on the use of it, rather than it&#039;s feature list. For example, most of the CRM provide a good set of functions for lead nurturing, email campaigns, and other marketing automations. But most of the companies use CRM for list management and management reporting purpose only. May be it&#039;s meant to be like that. More integrated services and products emerge in the marketplace - more we see fragmented, customized use of more than one tools by the companies. 
  
CMS will be (and should be) the heart of the B2B marketing, but I don&#039;t see other tools loosing out either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great topic! Here goes my 2 cents.</p>
<p>Effectiveness of a tool depends on the use of it, rather than it&#8217;s feature list. For example, most of the CRM provide a good set of functions for lead nurturing, email campaigns, and other marketing automations. But most of the companies use CRM for list management and management reporting purpose only. May be it&#8217;s meant to be like that. More integrated services and products emerge in the marketplace &#8211; more we see fragmented, customized use of more than one tools by the companies. </p>
<p>CMS will be (and should be) the heart of the B2B marketing, but I don&#8217;t see other tools loosing out either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Kessler</title>
		<link>http://www.velocitypartners.co.uk/2010/02/08/b2b-web-marketing-the-platform-battle/comment-page-1/#comment-1082</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Kessler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 19:13:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.velocitypartners.co.uk/?p=1335#comment-1082</guid>
		<description>Thanks David -- great insights (and an excellent post you refer to).
I do think CRM will always play a role for marketers and it&#039;s unlikely the CMS will ever take up all of the CRM functionality.  
But I do think the CMS will be where marketers will spend most of their time -- as long as it integrates with the CRM!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks David &#8212; great insights (and an excellent post you refer to).<br />
I do think CRM will always play a role for marketers and it&#8217;s unlikely the CMS will ever take up all of the CRM functionality.<br />
But I do think the CMS will be where marketers will spend most of their time &#8212; as long as it integrates with the CRM!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Raab</title>
		<link>http://www.velocitypartners.co.uk/2010/02/08/b2b-web-marketing-the-platform-battle/comment-page-1/#comment-1081</link>
		<dc:creator>David Raab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 17:18:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.velocitypartners.co.uk/?p=1335#comment-1081</guid>
		<description>Doug, I quite agree that both CRM and CMS vendors are threats to marketing automation.   See my blog post http://bit.ly/4FUcOQ and related links for a deeper analysis.   

As to whether CRM or CMS vendors will eventually be the winners, it&#039;s hard to say.  CMS vendors do control the Web site, but there are other channels to consider.  CRM systems already has some marketing automation capabilities and the big ones (Oralce/Siebel, SAP) already sell to marketers too.  CMS vendors sell to IT, not marketing, although that may is changing slowly.  Perhaps more critically, CRM systems are built on identifiable customer databases (name, address, email) while CMSs are just beginning to add some personalization capabilities that involve tracking simple profiles (often of other-wise anonymous cookies).  

Regarding CMS vendors with marketing automation capabilties:  SiteCore and Marqui definitely belong on the list.  I&#039;m sure plenty of others are barking up the same tree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doug, I quite agree that both CRM and CMS vendors are threats to marketing automation.   See my blog post <a href="http://bit.ly/4FUcOQ" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/4FUcOQ</a> and related links for a deeper analysis.   </p>
<p>As to whether CRM or CMS vendors will eventually be the winners, it&#8217;s hard to say.  CMS vendors do control the Web site, but there are other channels to consider.  CRM systems already has some marketing automation capabilities and the big ones (Oralce/Siebel, SAP) already sell to marketers too.  CMS vendors sell to IT, not marketing, although that may is changing slowly.  Perhaps more critically, CRM systems are built on identifiable customer databases (name, address, email) while CMSs are just beginning to add some personalization capabilities that involve tracking simple profiles (often of other-wise anonymous cookies).  </p>
<p>Regarding CMS vendors with marketing automation capabilties:  SiteCore and Marqui definitely belong on the list.  I&#8217;m sure plenty of others are barking up the same tree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Kessler</title>
		<link>http://www.velocitypartners.co.uk/2010/02/08/b2b-web-marketing-the-platform-battle/comment-page-1/#comment-1080</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Kessler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 16:23:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.velocitypartners.co.uk/?p=1335#comment-1080</guid>
		<description>Kevin:  I don&#039;t think of smallworlders as a CMS vendor -- far too generic to contain all that you do!
(anyone out there need a fab intranet for their marketing department or agency... smallworlders.com is your man!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kevin:  I don&#8217;t think of smallworlders as a CMS vendor &#8212; far too generic to contain all that you do!<br />
(anyone out there need a fab intranet for their marketing department or agency&#8230; smallworlders.com is your man!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.velocitypartners.co.uk/2010/02/08/b2b-web-marketing-the-platform-battle/comment-page-1/#comment-1079</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 15:54:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.velocitypartners.co.uk/?p=1335#comment-1079</guid>
		<description>you know more than one CMS vendor who is out in front surely?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you know more than one CMS vendor who is out in front surely?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
